One Lone Conservative's Reality in a Sea of Liberal Delusion's
.....Is it a possibility?
Published on May 8, 2004 By couchman In Current Events
Recently I came across several op-ed's pieces on the links between Mohamed Atta & the Former Iraqi Regime which by now most people have heard or read about to some extent. The report on the link itself, if true, could seriously upset what I've come to term as the Hyper-Left or even the "Useful Idiot" crowd for those that know the phrase whose arguments have been one part revolutionary, one part socialist dogma and one part intellectual elitism who have made their rather passe' catch-phrase agruments their bread - and - butter.

In short the story regarding the link goes pretty much like this:

Prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the US, Czech Intelligence had been keeping surveilance on a particular member of the Iraqi Embassy in Prague, Ahmad Khalil Ibrhim Samir al-Ani, a known and documented member of Iraqi Intelligence for some time. On April 8, 2001 of that year, al-Ani (with Czech surveilance in tow) was observed as he met with an Arab speaking man in Prague....some reports cite that the surveilance team made either/both video or photograph record of this meet but so far I have not seen any evidence supporting this but it is part of standard surveilance procedure that both types of equipment are used. It is important to note that al-Ani who was posted to Prague from March of 1999 to late April of 2001 was under that same surveilance for a majority of his time there.

After 9/11, when the highjackers had been identified (although certain Hyper-left conspiracy sites say that the highjackers were either aids infected pilots pissed at the current state of aids research or US servicemen under "orders" by Bush to crash the commercial planes.....Can we say not in touch with reality?), and their pictures were shown to the general public, several agents from the Czech counter-intelligence unit assigned to keep tabs on al-Ani identified Atta as the arab speaking man who had met with the Iraqi intel agent back in April of 2001. The statement by the Czech agents led to al-Ani being expelled two weeks later.

In the wake of Baghdad falling to the coalition in the war, the Iraqi Embassy in Prague was searched uncovering documents showing that al-Ani had a scheduled meeting with a 'Hamburg student' on that April 8 2001 date were uncovered. Although al-Ani denied he met with Atta and repeated his denial while detained by US forces and failed to indicate who he had the April 2001 meeting with. To date..publiclly...the CIA has been unable to confirm the Prague meeting between al-Ani and Atta (this does not mean as is repeatedly said in both the media and blogs the world over that US intelligence discounted the Czech report as false..sorry to burst the Hyper-Lefts bubble yet again) and that US intelligence is somewhat skeptical at this point of Saddam's former regime had a hand in the 9/11 attacks. ( again for the benefit of the Hyper-Left...skeptical does not equate into discounting it.) Lastly, for those asking how Atta could have slipped into Prague unnoticed as it were, Spanish Intelligence uncovered info indicating that several Algerians, Khaled Madani & Moussa Laouar, supplied both Atta and another al-Qaida member, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, with false passports...I wonder if the name on those passports matches up with visa records in Czech republic? Finally, one last side note...of the several news stories have been written bout Iraqi Intelligence's possible connections to al-Qaida the most interesting are the ones regarding the dealings between Iraqi Intel and Ansar al-Islam in particular but instead of writing more about it the link below will take you to the story or one of them anyway.



I'm not sure if the Czech report is credible (I give it the benefit of the doubt which is more then the Hyper-Left does) but if it is...it would most certainly shake many misconceptions that persist today to their core..while it is said that Saddams regime was secular and would not in any way have dealings with the likes of al-Qaida I find that tired agrument somewhat hollow....consider the way organised crime operates.....when you have say the American Mafia working with the likes of the Russian Mob or even say the likes of the Chinese Triads, they may not like each other...they may even hate each other...but in the end they work together for one simple and unified goal....it's business....why does this possibiltiy of two diametriclly opposed ideologies working together against a common foe..this case the west or more to the point the US get thrown aside as nothing more than an illusion?



Link

Try the link above to read one particular story on possible connections of Iraq & al-Qaida

Comments
on May 08, 2004
why does this possibiltiy of two diametriclly opposed ideologies working together against a common foe..this case the west or more to the point the US get thrown aside as nothing more than an illusion?

the groups you mention as occasional collaborators (triads, lcn/russian mob) are criminal enterprises working in cooperation when it benefits them financially. theres no ideology to complicate things. i cant imagine hamas and the west bank settlers working together even if that was the only means by which both groups could avoid being wiped off the face of the earth by some horrible unnamed natural disaster.



on May 08, 2004
Let's see shall we recap what terrorist orgs and organised crime have in common.....

Illegal Narcotics Trafficing
Weapons Smuggling
Internet Crime
Pornography


and those are just the high notes of both groups simularities.......
.....yeah they have nothing in common
on May 09, 2004
i'm confused. you feel criminal gangs are essentially ideologic? members are primarily united by commitment to or advocacy of a uniquely specific common abstract political, philosophical or theosophical concept?
on May 09, 2004
Ideology aside....you still fail to see both groups comonality.....although some my say the ideology of organised crime is money & power....terror groups might be terror & power....with that aside..groups throughout the ages have worked as it were with those they tend not to agree with on anything....the possible alliance of iraq and al-qaida would only be one of convenence...as both would understand down the road that "truce" would out live its usefulness...during the cold-war both the US and USSR alligned themselves with less than stellar groups for a common purpose..opposing each others ideology.....this isnt a hard concept to understand unless you are very naive or closed minded....