One Lone Conservative's Reality in a Sea of Liberal Delusion's
I'm Shocked...Shocked Over the Double Standard!
Published on May 14, 2004 By couchman In Current Events
In the Aftermath of the brutally barbaric killing of Nick Berg, the usual reactionary questions are being asked such as why Berg was in Iraq, why didn't the US-led coalition protect him, etc; but they are just part of the course and are not unexpected by me or many others. But while I was gonna write bout Bergs death as my main talking or maybe what should be called bitchin' point, I decided to do bit of a side story related to the incident at hand, i.e. the reaction in the middle-east over it. Now while the reaction in both the US and in Europe is important as well...it is the reaction in the middle-east among both its mainstream media and more importantly, the "Average Iraqi on the Street" opinion.

On Saturday, Berg's decapitated body was discovered in Baghdad and surprisingly or disgustingly the video taped beheading of Berg by al-Qaida's Iraqi group Ansar al-Islam was posted on one of Ansar's sites on Tuesday almost as a recruiting/marketing video and calling the act a reprisal for the alleged abuses in the Abu Ghraib prison. By early Wednesday, the world press and public outrage began to pickup the story & make their feelings known except for one key area, The Middle-East. While some Arab press commentors condemned the barbaric nature of the crime, they mostly were annoyed (if we can use that term) that the act would draw the spotlight away from the prison abuses....so much for balanced reporting.

"In normal circumstances, I could condem the slaughtering of the American, but we are living in abnormal circumstances. I cannot condem it now..", said Egyptian columist Nour al-Huda Zaki,a senior journalist for the Cario paper Al-Arabi, went on to add to which I find almost laughable, "The country that advocated human rights priciples is now violating them and taking us back to the dark ages." Wow, so when did the US begin forcing Honor killings, baning women from an education, blame the ills of their people on say France instead of looking to themselves for the root causes , and ignoring and not prosecuting those who are involved in abuses......go figure!

Some of Zaki's words ring true as across the Arab world, very few banner headlines or TV reports touched on Berg's death let alone even did major reports on it. But like everything there are exceptions...most notably Kuwait's Al-Siyassah daily which did run a story with the photo of Bergs severed head held by one of the masked cowards, and yes they are cowards...not dediacted..not freedom fighters but cowards and I'm being nice not using my usual colorful metaphors to describe them. But Al-Siyassah wasnt the only exception in Kuwait, as 5 of 7 Kuwaiti dailies published front-page major stories on it. Intrestingly enough....the two biggest pan-Arab TV networks, Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya, did brief segments showing some of the sickening video Tuesday and later on Wednesday...noticably absent was the actual beheading itself. "The news story itself is strong enough," said Jihad Ballot a spokesman for Al-Jazeera and he added, " To show the actual beheading is out of the realm of decency." Okay, so its fine to show dead bodies of US servicemen and women, insurgents waiting in hiding to attack coalition convoys and the attacks itself but the beheading is out of the question? when did Al-Jazeera discover journalistic ethics?? Arab TV stations have shown in the past their zeal in airing bloody pictures from wars more so than any in the West but they "draw" the line at showing the beheading. Frankly their excuse rings bit hollow because regardless of what is the general opinion in that region, airing this deploreable act would have serious consequences for al-Qaida.

Generally most publications such as Al Rai in Jordan, several English-language papers in United Arab Emirates,among others ran major stories without any pictures and no Iraqi one ran the stroy but that may very well be because the news broke late...lets see in a day or two whats printed there.....

I would finally add that in almost comical fashion, both Hezbollah and Hamas made statements against the act to which the general media ran on...too bad their statements were a tired rehash of blame US as monsters.....but I began thinking what were their reasons to come out against those who did this...quite simply it smells like a simple smokescreen as Hezbollah must have gotten a Damascus spank to do it as Syria has been put under increasing pressure and sanctions by the admin and as for Hamas....they have been a roadblock to peace between Israel and the Palestinians and blaming the US in any way gives them credibility points in the region......

Some other networks such as both state TV networks in Jordan and Kuwait at least used still photos in their reports of the story.
When those that use the alleged abuses in the Abu Ghraib prison as some rallying point that the US is being hypocritical, or as an excuse to main and murder, I would argue that those abuses are being investigated and those responsible will be prosecuted.....aside from Israel...how many nations in that region can say the same. None!

Comments (Page 1)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on May 14, 2004
"...baning women from an education, blame the ills of their people on say France instead of looking to themselves for the root causes , and ignoring and not prosecuting those who are involved in abuses......go figure!"

As far as I know, and prove me wrong if you can, America has been guilty of all these crimes at some time or another.

And when you look at a global media environment, Fox News and other American news newtworks are more than providing a counter balance to the coverage being broadcasted or printed in the Middle East.

You could argue that its not providing a balanced picture there, where it is most needed. But last time I checked the US has never enjoyed or entertained other countries coming in and telling them how they should or should not cover an event that is pertinent to them.

I would dare say that the whole concept of an "embedded" media presence in the invading force with its concurrent enforced media black outs did not promote balanced coverage in the heat of the invasion itself.

It would be fair to say that the US has upheld some of its journalistic high ground with the "outing" of those abuse photos, but it is certain that we have not seen all or the most brutal images to be had of those "events", as can be attested if you read about the congressional hearing (did i get that right?) that is currently in progress.

My last point would be that the depiction of dead bodies and the airing of an actual killing are extermely far removed from each other in decency or relevence to the effective coverage of news events. Many have seen the almost clinical tracings of dead bodies on CNN, FOX and nearly all other news agencies, but few of us have actually witnessed a killing on the above mentioned. I do not think that many would.

If you are American, I would like to register my shock and saddness at the brutal killing of Nic Berg. It was senseless, callous and a crime against humanity and humanism. I cannot pretend to understand the torrents of rage and incomprehension that is possessing you as a collective people.

I hope for a resolution to all this maddness where all parties aggrievences and losses are noted and accounted for. I want the process of forgiveness to begin. I do not want anymore suffering, be it the suffering of an American, Iraqi, Israeli, Palestinian, etc, etc.


on May 14, 2004
"As far as I know, and prove me wrong if you can, America has been guilty of all these crimes at some time or another"
Right on NotSo...Right on! Another enlightened one. The numbers are growing. Bravo! *claps and welcomes you to the small but growing group...I'm member #
on May 14, 2004
mikimouse,

Is this meant to be cryptic, sarcastic, or am i just DENSE. *scratches head and suspects the later*

Please, oh PLEASE forgive my ignorance:)
on May 14, 2004
Just reading over your "Death of the American Dream" blog, I would almost think that it was congratulatory, but these days I'm so so confused here at JU that i don't quite know what to make of anything. Being on here makes me feel kinda funky.

Not necessarily a bad thing;)
on May 14, 2004
As the official mikimouse translator sanctioned by the top brass - what he meant to say this action was in protest of another. Had the prison abuses not occurred, we wouldn't be talking here now.
on May 14, 2004
Thanks JakeD, translator almighty ("sanctioned by the top brass", now thats gotta mean something)

Could I possibly call on your service for other areas and users of JU. I think i need it.
on May 14, 2004
Your welcome! That's what I am here for
on May 14, 2004

As far as I know, and prove me wrong if you can, America has been guilty of all these crimes at some time or another.


America might have done all those things in the past, but the difference is that the Arab nations are doing that now.


And Europe was guilty of genocide many times. Therefore, using the logic of judging the current nations by past actions, Europe is the worst place on Earth.

on May 14, 2004
Had the prison abuses not occurred, we wouldn't be talking here now.


Actually....in reality if the prison abuses never occured, Berg would have been killed just the same and blamed on another perceived wrong.....frankly al-qaida and their thugs in region, Ansar al-Islam have no moral ground to stand on...
on May 14, 2004

Precisely. Monsters will always find something to rationalize their actions.

JakeD: Can you remind me again what specifically the crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center were in response to? Or maybe the USS Cole? Or the Embassy bombings? What specifically were these in response to?

on May 15, 2004
"JakeD: Can you remind me again what specifically the crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center were in response to? Or maybe the USS Cole? Or the Embassy bombings? What specifically were these in response to?"

Draginol,

This is a very, very silly thing to ask.

The US's past actions in the middle east and just about anywhere else on the globe has given a great many people, a great many things to retaliate against.

This will be a short list as i would need several hours of research for it to be comprehensive.

Reagan's contra-affair, Bay of Pigs, Clinton's cruise missle attack on a pharmaceutical factory, Heavy subsidising of the Israeli and Colombian military, invasion of Grenada and Panama, funding of death squads in central america, the fixing of elections in Chile and Argentina, the support of a military dictatorship in Brazil, military presence in many countries where the population perceive such a presence as a de facto occupation (Saudi Arabia being the most important case given the present circumstances), the abuses and irresponsibility of US multinationals in their offshore operations(in many instances with the backing of the US government and international organisations with their HQ's, funding and direction residing in the US. As an example refer to the United Fruit Company in Guatamala); a botched attempt at intervention in Somalia, a complete lack of intervention in African nations (specifically Rhwanda); the installation and maintenance of a corrupt regime in Iran, the outright war in Vietnam with explicit targeting of civilians and the illegal bombing of a country neighbouring the war zone, etc, etc.

I can understand and assimilate most of these actions into a philosophy that deems it necessary to use such methods when one wants to become the worlds dominant economic, cultural and military player (read superpower).

I will forgive America all these things when i view them through the prism glass of political expediency.

I cannot accept outright lying and positions of moral certainty in regards to actions that are at best morally ambiguous or ambivalent.

And Super Baby.

As far as I know America is still occupying a Middle Eastern country. A country they invaded without any provocation (unless you can prove unequivically that Iraq was somehow responsible for 9/11. And how can you explain away the fact that Al-Qa'ida found its genesis in Saudi Arabia, one of America's staunchest allies in the Middle East).

This is happening now. As far as I know European countries have since learned from their mistakes (mistakes that cost them dearly. Algeria almost cost De Gaul his government and Portugal paid in a river of blood for Angola), mistakes that America refuse to learn from, or do you really want to and enjoy seeing the bodies of your dead young dragged along a dirt road.

Couchman.

I do not see how bullets in the head, bombs falling on your children and wealth that is generated from oil somehow never staying in your own country or seeming to find its ways into the hands of families that are US "endorsed" can be seen as perceived wrongs. The close to 150,000 troops in Iraq are perceived because they are there.

I believe that these are truths the American population needs to come to terms with before your government needlessly kills more of its own. Given much longer in Iraq the US will incur a casualty list as long as those suffered in 9/11. These deaths are even more needless than those as it has been your own government doing the killing (unless you really expected to invade someone elses country and expect no opposition. Just like the Vietnamese were supposed to greet you with open arms as back in '65-'75).

How many of your own have to die in a conflict, that is not reducing the activities of terrorists but encouraging them, before you realise that there could be other options and that, yes, your government is doing something wrong.



on May 15, 2004
Bring back the troops, increase the defense spending, nuke the oil fields as demonstration of what will happen to anyone that approaches american soil
on May 15, 2004
Can't help you out on the USS Cole but every kindergarten kid knew of the political unrest in the Saudi empire but 18 months ago. The also knew that the strategic positioning of troops run in Muslim mecca territory was just itching for confrontation. All requests for removal fell on the deafest of ears until the reserve troops were called out last year as iraqi backup. Basically they positioned themselves in center of middle east tensions, paid a lot of money to king Fahd and family and contributed to destabilizing the region. Are they the end cause for hate? No. But most bombing incidents are the result of years worth of failed negotiations dictated soley by greed and money. This is why I support the heart of america but the foreign policy that heads this nation needs to be sorely revised. And no, I am not a Kerry supporter.

on May 15, 2004
NOTSO I' m on YOUR side. Duh! And p-off jaked and have the coffee ready on Monday.
on May 15, 2004

NotSoHighlyEvolved:  So basically your theory is bad karma for the US.

There's one little problem - it backs up precisely our point: The terrorists would have latched on to somethign else as an excuse to murder innocent Americans and people like you would have helped them justify it.  So even if the abuse of the Iraqi POWs had never happened, that man would have still been murdered horribly.

And people like you would say "Well yea, he died because of the Bay of Pigs back in the 50s" or some other such thing.

Do you realize how lame that sounds?  Al Qaeda doesn't have a specific limited objective. Al Qaeda's own stated objective is the full conversion of the United States to Islam. Nothing short of that will suffice to them. Until we do that, they will try to kill as many of us as they can. Our objective is pretty straight forward - we want to stop them from murdering us en masse.

It is a bit ironic that people forget WHY the US had that presence in Saudi Arabia btw. It was to enforce the UN no-fly zones. Talk about damned if we do, damned if we don't. 

3 Pages1 2 3